Black leaders urge “minority impact assessments” for all new federal regulations to prevent disparate impact

Excessive regulation stifles economic growth and has a disproportionate negative impact on small businesses, say members of the Project 21 black leadership network. To prevent any new and unnecessary hardship due to overregulation, Project 21’s “Blueprint for a Better Deal for Black America” recommends reining in agenda-driven government agencies by requiring “Minority Impact Assessments” that preemptively determine and remedy how new federal regulations might harm minority communities.

“Regulations come at a cost. In the past, the government has imposed regulations while only occasionally assessing the associated costs to the overall economy. We almost never ask if marginalized communities will be impacted,” said Project 21 Co-Chairman Horace Cooper, a former professor of constitutional law and senior counsel to congressional leadership. “It’s time we start asking the Feds to determine whether minorities and working-class citizens will be helped or hurt before proceeding with new regulations.”

Project 21’s Blueprint is a 57-point plan for removing barriers blocking blacks from empowerment and ensuring they have their chance to attain the American dream.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce estimates that federal regulation costs the U.S. economy up to $1.9 trillion annually in lost productivity and added expenses. It further notes that the cost of regulation is 20% greater for firms with 50 or fewer employees – the type of businesses most commonly owned by black entrepreneurs.

As for regulatory impact on health and well-being, Professor Ralph L. Keeny noted in the Journal of Risk and Uncertainty: “Regulatory costs are paid by individuals, which leaves them with less disposable income. Since individuals on average use additional income to make their lives safer and healthier, the regulatory costs lead to higher mortality risks and fatalities… Cost-induced fatalities disproportionately burden the poor and minorities, particularly blacks.”

Project 21’s Blueprint also recommends rolling back politically-motivated regulations that threaten public safety, such as the Food and Drug Administration’s regulation of smokeless tobacco products — which threatens public health by keeping these safer alternatives to cigarettes off the market — and Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards, which have diminished the safety of automobiles.

“Regulations made without proper care and oversight can destroy jobs, increase energy costs and deny consumers things that they want and even need,” said Project 21 member Derrick Hollie, the president of Reaching America. “While government seeks to ensure development doesn’t harm the environment, they should be at least as careful in making sure their own rules don’t harm our economy — particularly poor and minority communities relying on any opportunity they can get.”

The Trump Administration is already re-examining CAFE standards, having announced a rollback of the Obama-era mandate of 54.5 miles per gallon by 2025. In a letter to Secretary of Transportation Elaine Chao and Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt, Project 21’s leadership wrote : “Excessive regulatory costs that make products unaffordable are one of the most significant non-racial obstacles to black economic progress… Increasing black hardship and jeopardizing driver safety for such a small payoff is simply irrational.” This White House action was deemed “Blueprint Compliant” by Project 21.

Project 21 has released “Blueprint for a Better Deal for Black America” recommendations for reforming different policy areas each week since April. The entire Blueprint is now available on its website. Project 21 leaders have also briefed key staff at the White House and congressional leadership about the 57 policy recommendations — covering education, criminal justice, economics and more — that are available in the Blueprint.

Project 21, a leading voice of black conservatives for over 25 years, is sponsored by the National Center for Public Policy Research. Its members have been quoted, interviewed or published over 40,000 times since the program was created in 1992. Contributions to the National Center are tax-deductible and greatly appreciated, and may be earmarked exclusively for the use of Project 21.

Founded in 1982, the National Center for Public Policy Research is a non-partisan, free-market, independent conservative think-tank. Ninety-four percent of its support comes from some 60,000 individuals, less than four percent from foundations and less than two percent from corporations. Sign up for email updates here.

Follow Project 21 on Twitter at @Project21News or general announcements. To be alerted to upcoming media appearances by Project 21 members, follow our media appearances Twitter account at  @NCPPRMedia.

 

Recent News

Scroll to Top